User blog comment:KidVegeta/KidVegeta's reviews/@comment-1668079-20110417020442

Okay, I know my reviews aren't the best they can be. I accept that. But what I love is that I am requested to do these reviews, and yet I am only asked to review stories that are of a high calibre (I use that term loosely).

From what I have read, I feel as though I have yet to be asked to review any fanons that seriously have flaws, save a couple, and so I can't give advice that is needed. Granted, there is always advice to give, but when flaws are hard to come by, advice is hard to give.

I do understand what you're getting at with lazily reviewed stories, and how when I can't find cons I don't give them a ten, but a big factor, something I have failed to mention, is my enjoyment. I can find read a story, think it is very well done, but not enjoy it. It's all about the mood. Liking a story and giving it a lot of cons aren't mutually exclusive; as shown with the Mrovian Trilogy. Same with not enjoying a story yet giving it pros.

Now, I fail to see how I gave bad advice to Brady Patrick. Granted, my closing comment was a bit vague, but I can't see how I gave wrongful advice. And why does not being one of our best authors detract from the worth of my opinion? I know I can't write as well as Destructivedisk or Brady Patrick, but that doesn't mean I can't offer advice. A contrary view is necessary for progression.

However, with all of the above said, I am agreeing with you on the point that I am unclear with cons that could be very useful, but I don't elaborate on them. I'll look out for that from now on.